2.) As a General Aviation pilot, it is easy to see why other GA pilots may be against the privatization of ATC. Most feel as if ATC will put GA flights on the side burner because all of the airline flights will have priority. Another issue that has been brought up is the fact that GA pilots must pay to use the privatized ATC. It was even stated by Sean Elliot in the General Aviation news that “Any privatization effort must not result in a pay-to-play scheme for general aviation”. Sean Elliot was also clear to mention that “Though we certainly understand the desire to find ways to make the air traffic system more efficient and cost-effective, the current fuel tax system of revenue generation works and is efficiently and fairly collected” our current fuel tax system still works, so why try and veer away from that. On the other side, the airlines are all for the privatization of ATC because it will help them save money on fuel and delayed flight expenditures, as well as help reduce emissions. Two main lobbyist groups are the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) and the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA). Both of these lobby groups are pushing to prevent the privatization of ATC because it will drastically change general aviation. They don’t want to see private pilots having to pay to use ATC, and they don’t want to see GA pilots loss access to airspace because of airline priority.
3.) Canada has its
own privatized ATC system that started in 1996, called Nav Canada. It is a
non-profit organization that is governed by a group of board members and it is
completely separate from the Canadian government. Nav Canada was originally
funded by ticket tax money provided by the Canadian Government (Mark,2012). After
about three years, Sid Kozlow (Vice President of Nav Canada) states “Nav Canada
was on its own trying to make the system work with fees based on aircraft type,
weight and distance traveled” (Mark,2012). The reason why the privatized ATC
runs more efficiently for the Canada is solely due to the difference in air
traffic density. Compared to the United States, who average nearly 64 million
flight operations per year, Canada has roughly 12 million take offs and
landings per year.
4.) In order to convert our
current system to a privatized ATC system, the congress would have to pass the
bill allowing ATC privatization. This proposal would also have to be approved
by an aviation committee. As of right now, the proposal is still up in the air
to make ATC an independent corporation. In order for ATC to be privatized,
users would have to pay out of pocket to use it and that is one of the main
controversies for all of those opposed to privatized ATC.
5.) I think that if ATC was privatized, the airlines would
definitely benefit from it. It would be more efficient for the airlines in the
realm of decreasing flight times, reducing the amount of delayed flights, and
help with cutting emissions down. The use of the NextGen technology would allow
the airlines to fly direct routes to their destinations, but at the same time
it would prioritize all of those flights over general aviation aircraft. As far as safety concerns, I do believe that
privatized ATC would be efficient in increasing safety among the airspace. There
are still many issues regarding privatization that need to be worked out,
especially the funding of it. In order for this proposal to pass, I think they need
to dig deeper into how they will upgrade to NextGen without charging GA pilots
to use it.
References
Green, P. S. (2015, September 28). America’s Air Traffic
Control System is Finally Going Digital. Fox Business.
Mark, R. P. (2012, January 1). Canada’s Private ATC System
Offers Alternative for Cost-cutting Nations. AIN Online.
NextGen – Air Traffic Control Modernization. (n.d.).
Retrieved January 17, 2016, from
https://www.gbta.org/usa/governmentrelations/Pages/NextGen–AirTrafficControlModernization.aspx
Wood, J. (2015, July 8). Call to
action issued over ATC privatization. General Aviation News.
No comments:
Post a Comment